Excerpts From The Little Book

As with Yeshua, his criminal prosecution was not as it appeared. Neither was mine. The imagination and offense thrust upon me in my prosecution was outrageous just as was the prosecution of the Savior. This is written here in order to make things simple and not full of the steam and crisis that the media projected. The whole nation now suffers this terrible plague that they poured upon me. This is how judgment works. "Whatsoever a man sows, that shall he also reap."

Seven years after my baptism of the extraordinary anointing from God and my consummation in the year 2000, the world was given its opportunity to declare its judgment of me, first in the media, the mob, then in the courts. I made it plain to the world at that time that it was the Father in heaven who had designed my events, so that they would not ignorantly come against God and receive damnation by doing so. But the courts gave their opinion of God’s movements in me and condemned me to prison for ten years for something not even against the law, but for something deep in the dark shadows of their own imaginations and “inferences.” The state's “contrivance” revealed a darkness that I was unaccustomed to before this time. I learned much in regard to the nature of man that I was not so aware of before. I now understand the mob, Pilate, Herod and Judas by experience.

I must now confess that my understanding of the world was somewhat naive, in that I thought that it was a safe place for truth. I believed in “constitutional rights.” I thought that there might be some good in it, and that people just do bad things, but if truth is presented to them that they would want that truth for themselves. But my eyes have been substantially opened to the fact that the world is entirely evil and that there is nothing good in it. The devil (Lucifer), truly, is the god of this world and he dominates every single facet of its paradigms and nomenclature — religious, political and in every other way. The science of evil has truly reached a grand scale so that the natural world cannot even understand itself.

The district attorney in my case once said, “The law is not the law.” I thought, if the law is not the law, then what is the law? Our society has now become lawless and “that wicked” mentioned in Scripture. Perhaps it always has been, and I have just been ignorant of it. I think that is the case. But these days the evil is in your face, out in the open, and because of this, it seems like it is more evil than before.

I am giving my opinion of the system, all my events, — their “injustice,” and their great illegality because of the way they disregarded clear evidence. My ignorance was truly exposed by the sheer evil of my prosecution. I did not expect it. I am not creating falsehoods, and making things up as they have done in their prosecution of me. Yeshua (Jesus) said to the Jews, “Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father. There is one that accuses you, even Moses in whom you trust.” I now say to the United States of America, “Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father. There are three that accuse you: even your laws, your Constitution, and your own profession. These will be your accusers, for you make a profession and assert that you are a nation of laws, ‘with liberty and justice for all,’ but you lie, and do not do what you say. You make up what you want, when you want, and you attack unlawfully whoever offends you and I declare to you, ‘Oh you hypocrites, you can predict the weather but you cannot discern the signs of the [end] times’.” Matt. 16:3.

The end times are even now quite evident in public affairs, for what they did to me, they now do to each other. The “end of the world” is guaranteed when it reaches its apex of corruption and has voted for corruption as a way of life. When speaking of law and justice, the truth is, they just don't care.


I want to establish a few facts regarding my legal case and its implications, because this is the context in which God revealed the shocking reality of heaven’s view. And I will begin by sharing the actual reason I think that there was a legal case against me in the first place, and I believe that the actual reason is not what the state said it was. It all started with a slanderous and grossly distorted movie about us. This movie, presumptuously referred to as a “documentary,” first aired on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom. It was then re-edited by National Geographic and aired in the United States, and around the world. It was created by Ben Anthony, who was cheered on by a mob of people who cried, in so many words, “Crucify him!” And there was a specific reason the media came against us in this way, followed by the mob, and then the state. A vigorous backlash can be expected, legal or otherwise, against anyone not conforming to the present accepted world view. When someone is noticeably different from the rest of the pack there is suddenly a mob with all kinds of opinions as to what he is about, and what he means, and this mob is largely directed and controlled by the media. These common attacks expose the gross hypocrisy and lying nature of the common consciousness and what Americans actually believe about “freedom” and “justice for all.”

On April 27th 2015, we attended my last evidentiary hearing over my habeas corpus petition. My family, church, and friends filled the courtroom gallery, and the district attorney, my attorney and the judge all heard the testimony of the two witnesses that the state had intentionally misused at my trial to condemn me. We had all seen and heard the expanded explanations of the evidence since my trial that the jury had not been privy to, which was contained in the 2010 video deposition and affidavit. Once more we all heard and saw the live testimony of those two witnesses on the witness stand in 2015. And the consistent testimony was, No, Mr. Bent did not touch us sexually. Yes, we believe Mr. Bent was wrongly convicted. But did the judge who heard all these things, then send me home a free man? No. The unjust conviction remained. The very clear force of the truth simply did not matter — the law did not matter. I could never have imagined that a judge would hear the testimony, that I had not committed the crime for which I was charged and convicted, yet retain the conviction in broad daylight. No explanation was given.

I turned to my attorney and asked, “Did the judge not hear the testimony of the witnesses?” He looked at me with a somewhat pained expression and said, “This is very complicated.” I could not understand how the actual and obvious truth could be complicated. My assessment was that the state of New Mexico, and the whole country, can now be considered lawless. My conviction was upheld for the state’s self-interest only. They did not care a whit in regard to how this false conviction would affect the two witnesses of the court. They were made to feel guilty for what the state did to me when they knew the charge was false. The law was meaningless now, and the young and innocent were not regarded. I was being born into the “real world” and I was naive no more.

I want to say that explaining all of these things makes no difference because the offended people wanted me crucified, legal or not. They do not want to be convinced of anything not conforming to their preconceived paradigm of life, and their offenses. When the mob moves, justice takes a hike to some far-off mountain. They don’t like me, and that is all the evidence they need for my “crucifixion.” They are offended at my assurance because they want me beaten down as they are. But I won. The sheer force of the truth made me win, no matter the hostility thrust upon me by my adversaries.

But I want to say this, that in this writing I have put most of the emphasis on the state, but the greater sin is with those who turned me over to the state. Yeshua said to the state: “You could have no power at all against me, except it were given you from above: therefore he that delivered me unto you has the greater sin.” John 19:11. No, the state is not the one with the greater sin, but those who were riding on the back of the beast with a bloody cup in their hand, guiding the beast with a bit in its mouth, are those with the greatest sin. They are my accusers who went to the devil for help against me, and it is they who have offended the Spirit of God the most. I have hurt no one, but my testimony offended them and made them feel bad, or guilty and that was enough. It was the same with Yeshua. His enemies made up the reasons for their own offense, but he had committed no crime.

The two witnesses whom the state had used to convict me in my trial when they were minors, A.S. and L.S., were both present in person at my habeas hearing. They were not minors now, and by their testimony on the witness stand that day, I was clearly and incontrovertibly declared innocent of any kind of sexual contact with them at all, and “using my authority to coerce them.” 

L.S. was called to the witness stand first by my attorney. She was asked to give her personal account of the legal deposition that she had witnessed her sister, A.S., give on July 1st, 2010. And she also testified observing how her sister had been negatively affected as a result of the state using her to condemn me. The state’s child molestation was astonishing to me. But why was I surprised when they kill unborn babies all of the time without a whimper? The state wanted to “put me away” and it was going to do anything necessary to do so.


In the proceedings, the question of whether I was guilty or innocent of “criminal sexual contact,” or “having used my authority to coerce them,” had been clearly answered by the two witnesses and we all heard it. But yet, in the full light of my declared innocence of the state’s charges, clear as crystal, the court continued to take the position that my conviction should stand, “because the court saw no reason to change the verdict.” This astonishing and outrageous conclusion was unfathomable to me and to many others as well. What greater reason could there be then, for vacating my conviction, other than “no crime was committed?”

But where did the jury verdict come from? It came like a mysterious dark fog from the many lies told by the state about me, but which I had not been permitted to address during my trial. The jury got to decide after being exposed to the National Geographic “fake news” about us that played on the world media for a full year before trial. This spiritual miasma filtered into the hearts and minds of the jury but I was not permitted to present a defense by explaining the truth and clearing away the fog. I am not even sure I could have cleared away the fog because it was so thick. The spirit in the courtroom was thicker and darker than anything I have ever felt. It was a different kind of evil than prison. The court had a dark, sticky, suffocating atmosphere, thirsting for blood. Prison did not feel as evil to me. Prison was made up of some folks who had made mistakes, watched over by correctional officers (guards) who didn’t get caught at theirs. But the justice they gave me and mine, will not be the justice that they will receive.

I believe that my constitutional right to present a fair defense was denied me. But I am not bitter, because all of this was necessary to expose the system for what it actually is. That is why God anointed me. It was for this.

I truly was mistaken when I believed that juries, judges and DAs follow the facts. Now I see they follow their prejudices, fears, and distortions fed to them, and the facts do not matter. They follow that dark spirit that hovers over them like a haunting. They follow their political expedience — they follow their self-interests. This is very clear in the media these days. Facts are invented in their “fake news” and those who want to believe them do, and those who do not, don’t. Evidence is a thing of the past. The truth is not the truth. The truth for them is that dark spirit that haunts them. Evil surmising is their law. The actual truth is despised.

What the court proved by continuing to press that the jury’s guilty verdict of “criminal sexual contact of a minor” be retained, after the clear testimony of the two adult witnesses to the contrary, was that “criminal sexual contact” by me was not the actual reason the state had put me in prison but no one seemed to be willing to just tell the truth about that. My crime seemed to be that I was not conformed to their world propaganda and that I influenced people in that nonconforming way of thinking and that was all that was required to kill me. They must “put away” dissenters (Protestants). This is the only conclusion I can come to. It is true that I don’t believe exactly as the other churches do, and I surely do not partake of their spirit, but in America, at least according to its profession, that should not be a crime. What I see now is that America is not better than any other despotism on earth; it’s just that American despotism is camouflaged under a cloak of moral self-righteousness — somewhat like disguising an animal trap by placing a covering over it. It lives by the same lie as all other dictatorships on the planet. But now I have come to fully understand Yeshua’s words when he said, “If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” Luke 14:26. Why? It is because the very nature of our own self-interests is evil and the basis for the root of all evil.

Truly we all saw and heard these things eye to eye with the judge. The crime for which I was charged and convicted simply did not occur. But there had to be a reason made to “put away” this nonconformist whom they named a “cult leader” who had “power.” But there is no cult greater than their own. When prejudice reaches the very judiciary, there is no resolution — there is no remedy. The crimes of the state are now exposed in the very roots of jurisprudence.

My explanation here will reveal the way God’s judgment is now working in regard to the events that have transpired concerning me, and why. This view of how things are so interconnected is very shocking, astonishing and mockingly unbelievable to the natural human mind, because the intricate causes and effects of God’s universe are nonsense to its simple, uninformed and shortsighted way of thinking. But my testimony here is from the Spirit Who speaks expressly — it is the mind of God in heaven revealing the way He views things and judges things as they actually are, and not how they have appeared to humans. These days the people just walk into a wall and they do not understand why their curses come upon them. The world is so evil because they are. But they don’t want to consider that possibility.

Speaking the way I do, and not like any other man, and as some have interpreted as arrogance, came with God’s Spirit. It all started in 1967 when God came to me, convicting me that I was an unconverted Sunday school teacher and causing me to approach unto Him, and then He converted me to Himself. (Jer. 30:21 AMP) The clarity and force of God’s communications have continued through the years and it has come to feel very natural to my spirit. At the time of my conversion, Father told me, “You will always tell the truth,” and since then I always have. But I did not know the depths to which truth would take a soul if he actually follows it. This world cannot accept anyone who tells the truth all of the time, and actually tells the truth as it is. If these recent events concerning me were not from God, I would tell the reader. Since they are from God, I tell the reader that they are. I am forced to strictly tell it as it is.

Even though I will be writing strong things in this testament as I expose what people have actually done, I have no condemnation for them. I understand them. What I have is simply a factual observation of the world that we live in. I also desire that nothing I express about our district attorney or the judge in my case, be taken as ill will, for I do not have any for them. I do not have offense for the ones who see themselves as only doing their job when a mob is beating down their door, even though it seems like a very wretched job to me, so full of trickery and deception. I do not take our present controversy in any personal way because I view all of these things as the movements of God for His own purposes, and His present purpose is to damn this present age because of its hypocritical condemnation of me and because it loves and has voted for wrongdoing. (2 Thess. 2:12)


I must clarify my personal events, however, because they involve many more people than myself. When the district attorney publicly and forcefully accused me of touching the sexual parts of young girls, and publicly stated that I required the girls to have sex with me or I would kick them out of the church, I am duty bound to answer those lying assertions and gross falsehoods, at least for the girls' sake. When he declared the innocent acts of God, which He placed upon these young women to ask of me, to be sex crimes, and the judge was complicit in this deception, I could not keep silent. When taxpayer money was used to prosecute me and incarcerate me, thereby involving the whole state in this outrageous perversion of the truth, I owe it to the public to explain to them what they have been made responsible for. The state publicly slandered me and in the worst way, and over a lie, and it is right for me to sanely and respectfully set the record straight, and that I have done. The district attorney publicly declared that A.S. and L.S. were victims of sex crimes, placing this dark stain upon them for life, when that statement was untrue. He made it up. The young women in no way deserved to be treated in this manner.

The court essentially labelled as “liars” the two young women that were its own subpoenaed witnesses, and upon whose testimony rested the entire foundation of their case against me, while it was actually the state who was the liar. The young women were not victims of anything, but the state invented them into victims. If anything, the young women were victims of the state.

This entire event carries with it enormous prophetic consequences. What the state did, and is doing, reaches deep into the invisible world. Everyone feels it in the air, even unconsciously. I am not judging any man’s motives in my writings. I am only commenting on what men have done, and my view of things, since the state got to publish its view of things and illegally punish me for that view. Yes, the state committed crimes to get me “put away.” The definition of a “crime” in Webster’s Dictionary is: “Activity that is against the law.” It is certain that the citizens of the state cannot pick and choose what laws they want to keep, but it seems now that the courts can. They can not only pick and choose which laws to keep, they can apparently fabricate them out of thin air. That is supposed to be the prerogative of the legislatures — creating laws from thin air — but clearly the courts missed that part of their legal training and are ignorant of the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers, for they seem to do it every day. If something is not illegal, but the prosecutors want it to be, they will just accuse you of a crime anyway. They name a crime and then say that you did it.

It was the act of always following my Father’s voice that brought me to my cross, as it has always done for every true believer. And this began on March 22, 1967, when He came to me and converted me to Himself when I was 25 years old and commanded me to keep the seventh-day Sabbath and to leave my present Sunday-keeping church and forsake Sunday worship which is prevalent in churches. When I agreed with God to keep the seventh-day Sabbath, and leave my Sunday-keeping church, immediately my whole life changed. My whole life changed so much that I was not even the same person as before, and I was now purposed to follow the will of God and His Voice of leading, no matter the cost to myself. My life was dedicated to listening for His personal instructions to me and always following them, and this I have done for over 50 years now. From the very beginning, however, I discovered that this change was not appreciated by those who were not like-minded. A natural separation began occurring because of it, and this only increased at every further step God took me in the path of His will and purpose for my life. As a result, I lost friends, family, property, jobs, support, church membership, and eventually even my freedom, for the cause of following Christ (the Anointing) and being true to Him, no matter the opinions of man to the contrary. If a soul does not follow the “Voice” when He speaks, then he is a castaway and the Spirit of God leaves him.


In past times, those who were wholly given over to Christ (the Anointing within them) were not appreciated by those who did not share the same purpose. Those who protested corruption in Christ’s name were tortured and burned alive by Roman Catholics who do not believe in freedom of religion if they are in power; they were imprisoned for manufactured crimes as I was, fed to the lions by pagans, stoned to death by the Jews, and beheaded and crucified. Now Protestants and others have the same heart as Rome.

In our generation, the faith that comes from God is not appreciated any more than it was in past times by those who do not have it and do not want it. Today, the faith of God is imprisoned, outlawed, ridiculed and mocked by the media, government, and even the churches. That is why the faith of God in me is mocked by them. True, the churches have a form of godliness, but the power of God is lacking. They have come to believe that fleshly emotion is God, or that financial prosperity is God, or that their particular ideas about God will save them. They each cherish their own particular doctrines, such as refusing blood transfusions, special underwear, Sunday sacredness, or hundreds of other bright ideas and theories that they made up. But there is no conviction from His Spirit and His presence has gone from them, for they have compromised the actual truth for so long that the Spirit was grieved away. There is only a shallow pretense of godliness and much hypocrisy, injustice, and a strange lingering guiltiness that never goes away. They do not see that they are the woman riding on the back of the beast in Revelation 17. They use the beast for their prosperity but it only brings their destruction in the end.

Because I didn’t worship what the world and its nominal Christian churches worship, and furthermore, because I could not be made to, this offended “the image of the beast,” the self-proclaimed ruler of this world and self-proclaimed educator of our children, and caused it to target me as not being part of it. Because I had failed to worship it, and it determined that I was not part of it, and could not be “caused to receive its mark,” I would no longer have the privilege of functioning in its world and would no longer be able to “buy or sell.” (Rev. 13:11-17) 

So it targeted me, first by its media system, full of “fake news” and then by its system of legal authority, full of fake justice. This present generation has truly proven beyond any doubt to me, that its profession of freedom and liberty is a falsehood, a mythology of stupid men who show utter inability to consider or judge things carefully and who have no heart for truth and justice. There is only a form of liberty now, and it is given to those who have the beast’s mark in their hand (their labors) and in their forehead (their thoughts and agreement). (Rev. 13:16)


The religions of America trust in their works, and their doctrines that they have made up. But no one, not one, will ever enter into heaven trusting in their holy works or beliefs, or by the keeping of their rules. No, not one will ever be saved that way. These things are all destined to be burned up in the lake of fire. We are followers of nothing but smoke, mirrors, pretense, force and make-believe if we are not followers of the Spirit of God’s Anointing living in us. (Rom. 8:14; Gal. 4:6) I am saying these things only to expose the lie. I personally believe that they already knew this in some guilty way, but the lie is more palatable to their selfish worldview. I want to destroy the “false hope” that their flatterers use with them. The gospel as shared by many preachers today is not good news, but fake news.

One is only saved by the act of God putting Himself in the human soul and living out His divine Life in that soul 24/7, just as He did with Yeshua (Jesus). For the Spirit of God’s Son within us will create the same divine experience of life in our fallen human nature that He created in Yeshua’s fallen human nature. (Eph. 4:13: Col. 1:27: 1 John 2:27; Acts 10:38; 2 Cor. 1:21) For some reason this doctrine causes people to become very angry and offended with me, or very afraid of me, but it has been the actual gospel for almost two thousand years. Any other gospel, which the Scriptures term it, is “anathema” (bound under a great curse).

Yeshua (Jesus) said to his Jewish contemporaries, as I say to my contemporaries, “The world cannot hate you; but me it hates, because I testify of it that the works thereof are evil.” John 7:7. 

So we were each “killed” by the world, thinking that they did God a service. (John 16:2) In my own case, after God anointed me for my work, Satan, my adversary, used the media, the mob, the state and every possible energy to crush out my testimony by the strong public attack against me by the mob of haters who are the self-condemned, and by imprisoning me. There is obviously much more to this than just praying with my hand on the sternum of a minor. The devil was exceedingly zealous to get me taken out.

The ridiculous nature of the dark, cold, hypocritical, religious extremism of these people is exposed by the simple truth of the events. The Islamists have not unleashed their terrorism against our community but professed Christians are the ones who unleashed their terrorism against us, “because” to quote George W. Bush, “they hate our freedom.”

So this is how and why it came to be that the state of New Mexico charged, tried and convicted me for “felony criminal sexual contact of a minor,” and sentenced me to 18 years, ten of which were actual prison time. The state attorney, (who is now a judge), told the jury that I must have bumped into a boob while praying for two of our minor children with my hand on them, because my hand is so large. This was the argument contrived to convince the jury that I must have touched a “boob.” The district attorney boasted of this contrivance in a radio interview. Both of the state’s witnesses denied the lying assertions of the prosecuting attorney.


The New Mexico law defines “criminal sexual contact” as “unlawfully and intentionally touching or applying force to the intimate parts of a minor…intimate parts mean the primary genital area, groin, buttock, anus or breast.” (Sec 30-9-13) The truth is that this crime never occurred, and the two young ladies over whom I was charged, stated so – before my trial, during my trial, and since my trial, as we have witnessed.

The young lady for which I was acquitted of criminal sexual contact, stated before trial:

I was given a copy of the ‘grand jury indictment’ and it states…Wayne Bent, did unlawfully and intentionally touch or apply force to the unclothed intimate parts of L.S. and L.S. was at least thirteen but less than eighteen years of age and the above named defendant, Wayne Bent, was in a position of authority and he used that authority to coerce L.S. to submit…

NO, NO, NO, none of those things occurred EVER, and I have testified over and over again that they haven’t. Michael [Wayne Bent] NEVER molested me or touched me sexually in any way nor did he use authority to coerce me.

The charges brought against Michael [Wayne Bent] are false and you have no proof for them. It was because of these very same false charges that you allowed CYFD [Children, Youth and Families Department] to kidnap me from my home. (Excerpts from L.S.’s letter to the District Attorney, June 25, 2008)

The young lady I was convicted over (16 years old) stated on the record:

There’s no reason…Wayne Bent should be in jail. He didn’t molest me in any way, absolutely not…I didn’t feel intruded upon…He’s innocent…there’s no reason he should be [in prison]…he was convicted over nothing. …I think the state didn’t do the right thing. I think they made a wrong choice. I honestly thought they…were going to send him back home. But no, they wanted to “put him away” and I don’t want to be the blame for it because I don’t feel he should be in there. He didn’t violate me at all. …He didn’t do anything to me to be in there. (Excerpts from A.S.’s videoed Deposition Interview, July 1, 2010)


During trial, the state attorneys told numerous lies. I was told by someone who counted them from the official trial transcript that there were forty-two of them. This poisoned the minds of the jury. The state told lies for which there was no testimony in court and for which there was no evidence. One lie was that I would “help the girls rob a bank.” Whatever does robbing banks have to do with criminal sexual contact of a minor? The district attorney stated at one of my hearings in front of the TV cameras, “He required all the minors to have sex with him or he would kick them out of the church.” The state and the mob invented or promoted numerous rumors and evil surmising for which there was no testimony or evidence. I believe that our state and nation are governed and ruled by a host of lying politicians, all holding power for their own self-interest and this is especially true for judges. They will do anything to preserve themselves, even if it is to completely pervert justice, and they are cheered on by the mob of those who have lost their reason.

The state attorneys repeated that I was naked with the girls, yet on the witness stand, under oath, the young lady, A.S., whom I was convicted over, stated very clearly that I was fully clothed during her healing procedure. No minor has ever seen me naked. I was declared “not guilty” over L.S. after I explained my healing procedure in regard to her. If the state must lie to get a conviction, it may very well put someone in prison, but it does not win. Sooner or later the state’s “sleight of hand” is exposed. A curse comes with injustice to any society that practices injustice. And it seems to me that the public loves to have it so.

I told L.S. to tell the truth and not be afraid of them, and I also thought at the time that you could trust the state’s legal system to follow the clear evidence. I was mistaken. A.S. and L.S. also discovered that the state could not be trusted. My eyes were also opened as I discovered how dark the legal system is, so full of the darkest spirits and a grave, lying, godless self-righteousness. The judge ended up punishing the young women for their faith, as he did me. He did not put them in prison but he did trouble their hearts and ruin their trust in state agencies. The judge opened their eyes to statecraft and it grieved them. It is a fact that the system does not actually care about kids. That is only pretense. Faith in God is only pretense also. “In God we trust” is a lie. While they make you swear on a Bible that you will tell the truth, they do not believe you when you do. In court, they only mocked at any mention of God’s instructions. In our generation, in the United States legal system, God is not allowed. They don’t believe that He exists, really, but God will show them that He does.

So these are some of the facts in the case, but now I would like to show the greater meaning in these things. At the two young ladies’ request, I had prayed for them with my hand on their sternum and clavicle area. The state lyingly called that “criminal sexual contact.” I was acquitted on L.S. and found guilty with A.S. for the same thing. On the face of it, the jury revealed that it lacked some basic honesty as well. Is not a stone, a stone? Or is one a stone, and the other stone a carrot? Was it legal to heal one young woman, but not the other, using almost exactly the same procedure for both? Incongruously, defying all normal application of logic, I was sentenced for the less extensive procedure, involving the older of the two sisters.

Is the law so loose, and jury instructions so meaningless and exploitable, that justice or the justice system is only about the political whims of men or the skills of jury manipulation? Is the American courtroom simply an arena for modern-day gladiators to pit their skills of deception against ordinary citizens who do not conform to their own personal social norms however hypocritical and apparently inflexible those social norms might be? Is it a place where ordinary citizens can be financially drained by simply trying to keep the system from steam-rolling them, while the state enjoys unlimited taxpayer money with which to come against the taxpayer? Is this what we have now? And what space of time lies between what U.S. jurisprudence has already become, and the show trials of the former Soviet Union?

L.S. wrote in a letter to the district attorney before my trial:

What happened to freedom of religion? Why can’t I, another human being just like you, be free to do as the God of heaven is leading me? Who gave you authority to step between God and His creation? What makes you think you are doing the right thing? What authority did God give you to interrupt the flow of our lives in Strong City when there has been no crimes of any kind whether it be sexual abuse, neglect, or control of hearts, mind or bodies of any human being? (Excerpts from L.S.’s letter to the district attorney, June 25, 2008)

Well, little lady, there is no actual freedom of religion and the Constitution is a dead letter. The only people with freedom of religion are those people who have a religion that does not make any difference, and one in which there is no real God.


But now comes the most shocking reality. This is the terrible truth. Yeshua (Jesus) said, “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones [minor children] which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck and that he was drowned in the depths of the sea.” Matt. 18:6 He also said, “…woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born.” Matt 26:24. Yes, those who condemned our God-given events offended these “little ones,” who are now named “minors,” and it would be better that the state would be cast into the sea and drowned. To create the mystery of God into a crime is a death knell for the state. Whether it be state officials, parents or friends, those who turn children, or anyone else, against the Anointing of God will perish in the final fires. These flames are already licking at the heels of this beast.

I will carefully explain the seriousness of this. I will share with the reader what occurred behind the scenes. The two young women that I was accused over by the state of New Mexico, on their own, had each come to me and shared with me that God told them to request of me this favor. I would pray for them and they requested to be unclothed. I did not request this of them, but because of my education I did understand the benefits this request could have if professionally managed. I earned a master’s degree in religion at Loma Linda University, which is a medical university for training physicians, and I learned healing in various forms during this period in my life. I was condemned and imprisoned for one of the principles I learned at LLU.

The following quotation is a description and explanation of the science behind the touch of healing by placing my hand on the upper sternum and clavicle area for healing purposes which came with the Spirit of the Anointing when He appeared in me in the year 2000. This is the healing touch that I carried out with A.S. for which I was sentenced to ten years in prison. I have inserted a few account details in brackets within the quotation below:

There is an ache at the center of the chest, called the grief point. In it lies the personal history of our pain — the fire, the loss, the impermanence we cannot control — and our unwillingness to expose it. Many do not acknowledge or even notice this ache. It is a pain we wish not to see, a constant reminder of how painful it is to be closed. We only mention this ache when it becomes too great to deny, when escape mechanisms are insufficient to suppress our grief.

This point has correlations in many healing technologies. It exists in all traditions which view the body as an energy system. It is the heart center, a point on the chest, on the sternum, roughly between the nipples and about two or three inches above where the rib cage comes together. A simple pressure exerted in that very sensitive area connects the mind/body with the heart center. [When I placed my hand on this point on the sternum/clavicle area, where, for the first time ever in my life, I began spontaneously placing my hand after Father spoke the Spirit of Messiah into me, I could feel in my own sternum area a warmth of healing love from the Anointing’s heart, going out of me to them. Many were able to take in the Anointing’s love and healing touch, in varying depths, while others seemed unable to let it in.]

This focal point where we hold much grief may be extremely sensitive. Investigate the breastbone to find this point of sensitivity. For many when they find it, it will be unmistakable. There may even be a slight indentation there. After you discover the grief point, place your thumb onto it. Obviously there is the sternum, the bone plate, but there is also something subtler which is perceived — a desire to protect yourself, to stay in control, to push away feelings. All the moments of hiding, of protecting ourselves from life, add layer upon layer over the heart. Thousands of such moments accumulating to become thick as armor. A density of self-protection and an unwillingness to enter directly the pain so long suppressed, which pushes back as you push into it. A resistance to life, a resistance to healing. The resistance of a lifetime pushing back.

This ache in the chest is like a compass that directs us toward the path of the heart. We are all grieving the Beloved. We are all aching our birthright, longing to be free. Our homesickness for God drives us from sensation to sensation, from thought to thought, emotion to emotion. But, when together we enter our grief, there is the combined strength to heal. When we enter the grief point, so sensitive when discovered that it is hardly able to be touched, we allow each other the space to let go of whatever is appropriate to release. We do not extract the pain from another, but simply offer that into which it can be expressed and healed. Working together at the grief point, opening to long-disregarded pain, ancient sufferings begin to melt. [My hand on a person’s grief point was an invitation for them to release their pain to me so I could bear it for them and heal them.]

As the grief point transforms into the touchpoint of the heart, we find ourselves offering its pain to the Beloved. One of the remarkable qualities of this is that when you have completed your process and take your finger away, you may still feel very distinct sensations where the grief point has become the touch point for the heart. [Some people shared this with me, that after I had taken my hand away, often the distinct sensations of the gentle pressure of my hand, remained.] Condensed from “Embracing the Beloved,” by Steven and Ondrea Levine


The young women told me that God had put this on them to ask of me. And, God also confirmed this to my heart and constrained me to fulfill their request. It was not illegal for them to take their clothing off and no sexual parts were ever touched. These events were wholly about spiritual and psychological healing. But the Scriptures say that in the end of days, the beast would come against the conscience, setting himself up as God over the conscience. This act is of a most serious nature for the entire nation and world.

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God (the human soul), shewing himself that he is God [over the conscience]. 2 Thess 2:3-4

This is what has happened and is happening nationwide. The one who exalts himself above the conscience of man is now ruling. On every level the courts rule against people of faith setting themselves up as God over the conscience. The day of “That Wicked” has come, for he is antichrist who does this.

I have never faulted the state for its opinion of me. One cannot expect the beast to understand God’s ways and movements. But I have faulted the state for lying and hugely contorting the events through deceitful statecraft and confusion. I have faulted the state because of its lying profession of liberty and justice for all, and freedom of conscience. The state is rightly faulted for its deception and corruption. Why was I not given a fair trial? At least the beast should have been able to work that out. The judge was responsible to insure that the trial was carried out fairly. I should have at least been able to tell what actually occurred, and why, instead of having to constantly put up with the state and the media throwing their tar balls at me. But they had no intention of letting me get away. The DA stated that if there was a hung jury he would bring me to trial two more times. They want what they want and that is total submission to them, regardless of conscience. In this they proclaim themselves to be God, and they sit in the temple of God. The prophesied dark day has come.


But now comes the most terrible reality. When the state, and some of the public, surmised all of their most poisonous and perverted imaginings onto me and charged me and my children over the heinous crimes it had contrived for this one spiritual healing event and for “contributing to their delinquency,” and then put me in prison for it, the state by doing so, accused the minor ladies of seducing me into a crime. The two young women were terribly shocked that the state would take their friend and “father” away over something purely of a spiritual nature, and that now they were responsible for it. And what they requested was not even against the law. Their purity was made to look perverted by the state, and invented into a violent sex crime by the judge, and the district attorney. Was it their own corrupt religion through which they looked to judge me? Perhaps they were looking at their own dark souls and projecting that data onto my image. I ask the question, Are these men sex perverts in their own minds, so that is how I look to them? Do these men frequent pornography pages and these pages colored their thinking about me? God only knows the answer to these questions, but in the great judgment it will all be made clear. I doubt very much that these men or their public that condemned me would tell us their secrets. But in the great judgment their secrets will become known.

But there is more. God showed me that from heaven’s point of view, the DA is guilty of sexually molesting these two girls in his office. I do not mean to say that the DA touched the girls somewhere physically. No. His crime was greater than that. He violated their minds and hearts by perverting their love and faith in God into a “sex crime” of the state, and then he punished their “father” and friend for the crime that they had initiated. Before God, he is guilty of accusing them of “criminal sexual contact,” and for being predators upon their “father” and friend. In a spiritual sense, the two girls were raped by the state in the district attorney’s “secret chambers.” It was a rape of their spirit and trust, for he turned their innocent request into a sex crime and condemned them by doing this, since the “crime” had been initiated by them. This is molestation of the highest order.

Why is it that a 16 year-old can have an abortion even without parental permission, or a sex change operation when desired, but a 16 year-old cannot be prayed over if she desired with my hand on her sternum without being charged with a violent sex crime. I would like to know the answer to this unfathomable mystery.


There were, however, events in my trial that were very troubling for me, not the least of which was the state’s heedless disregard for their own laws. It seemed as though the judge was part of a collusion; a conspiracy to incriminate me. In my trial, early on, it was very well established that I had no sexual contact with the two young ladies. Because of this clear testimony, my attorney entered a motion to dismiss, in an effort to end the trial proceedings, since it was abundantly clear by the testimony of the state’s own witnesses (and later, by the judge, himself), that it was essentially a vapor crime. But still the judge denied the motion to dismiss, allowing the state to continue with its fallacious charges and procedures.

My thoughts were, I am charged with criminal sexual contact. That has been disproved, so why am I still in court, and what am I now being charged with? The answer never came. Was the state convicting me of something else; of a crime that wasn’t a crime by law or any other logical reasoning, but “a crime” that only offended a covert agenda they had — religious, political or otherwise? I now believe that the agenda was religious and political and that the trail led to higher persons than our own DA. We were told by CYFD that it went at least as high as the governor. This was the same governor who was on Mr. Epstein's flight log.

Why was it so important, even from the outset, for these Roman Catholics to attack me and my congregation in a manner violating even their own laws? Why is it that Roman Catholics become so exercised, excited and heated over a grilled cheese sandwich that looks like it has the image of the Virgin Mary on it, or when one of their plaster images starts to bleed, but when the Anointing manifests itself in a man it’s time to burn him at the stake or crucify him? And why can I not say that God has anointed me for a specific mission without offending the court, but their Pope can claim to be God, calling himself the “Holy Father” which is the name only for God, or Vicar of Christ?  Do they know what vicar means? It means substitute for Christ; someone acting in His place or stead whose word is taken to be as the word of Christ Himself; speaking on His behalf with assumed authority by rule of agency. Why cannot I be named Messiah, which in the Hebrew simply means “anointed,” as in anointed for a mission, as all true Christians are, as I stated in court, but the Pope can be God and the replacement of Christ (the anointed)? So with respect, I have no apologies to make to the court.

It was more than obviously apparent that if I could not be tried honestly, without the state resorting to imaginary, nonexistent inventions against me, that that, in itself, was sufficient proof that there was no crime committed – except the “crime” they manufactured out of whole cloth from their own imaginations or from the dark recesses of their own evil surmising and guilty conscience. In other words, if the plain evidence of the case, submitted to the law alone, was insufficient to obtain my conviction, and overt dishonesty and lies were needed to accomplish the fact, that would indisputably prove that the state and judiciary obviously had other motives in mind that had not the least relationship to justice. I was an offense to them, and that was enough. It didn’t matter what the law actually said.

The state then began to insinuate, without presentation of proof or evidence of any kind, suspicious activities on my part. We seemed to have devolved into a legal nether-land of trial-by-inference rather than a trial-by-law, as was clearly set forth by the judge’s comment, quoted here directly from the trial transcript:

I looked at the sufficiency of the evidence and I felt that it was sufficient to allow the jury to consider, although the victim, the alleged victim, in the matter had said that she was not touched in the intimate parts of her body. The description provided allowed the jury to make that inference. Dec. 30 Tr 4 lines 11-14 [emphasis supplied]

I was charged with “criminal sexual contact of a minor.” It was proven that there was no “sexual contact.” So now the jury was allowed to “guess” that there might have been. As an example of the incomprehensible perfidy of the court, the judge actually spoke the following words into the record:

And, as finders of fact, they [the jury] were permitted to decide whether or not, in their understanding and…under the instruction they were given by this Court, whether or not there was a touching that was contrary to law. Dec. 30 Tr 4 line 15 [emphasis supplied]

As bizarre as this may sound, he actually did say that, and even though I was charged with “criminal sexual contact,” – which, according to the law and to any rational human mind would mean, by definition, actually “touching,” the judge boldly stated that even if I did not touch the girls in places deemed illegal, I was still guilty if the jury could imagine that I was. And why now did they “infer” that I was “not guilty” over L.S. but they inferred that I was guilty over A.S.? My head utterly spins over the total incredibility and lawlessness of the whole thing. I personally believe that our generation is mentally ill. What other explanation could there be?


The Judge said, in essence, that although the state’s own witness had declared under oath that “she was not touched in the intimate parts of her body,” the jury was allowed to infer that for which there was no evidence from which to draw that inference.

So, we have a judge who makes the credulous claim that the jury can infer something for which there is no foundation in fact or evidence from which to make that inference, yet they must infer that an illegal act took place with nothing to establish that fact in law or testimony. This would be like an observer viewing a field of tulips and inferring the farmer was actually poisoning children, because the observer saw a child picking some of them – the lack of evidence does not support the crime. This strangeness is glaring and foolishly obvious.

There is a Latin phrase in legal terminology, sine qua non, which means, loosely, without this, you cannot get that; without evidence, you cannot make an inference. But that did not in the least deter the judge.

Judge: “And, as finders of fact, they [the jury] were permitted to decide whether or not in their understanding and…under the instruction they were given by this Court, whether or not there was a touching that was contrary to law.” Fascinating logic here! How can the jury decide there was any act “contrary to law” with A.S. when there was no evidence or testimony presented in court from which to make that inference? If there is no evidence at all to indicate any crime has taken place with this young lady, nothing can be inferred from that except – no crime has taken place. There was not even any evidence or testimony that could be construed into a crime with her. No crime must be the only logical and legal conclusion, no matter how intensely a particular judge wants at least one jury trial on his record before the next election; no matter on what scoreboard the district attorney desperately wants an ‘X’ in the win column of the highest profile case he has ever tried; no matter what twisting and perverting of legal language is used to cover up their own perverse and venal motives. Sine qua non – you can’t have your cake unless there actually is a cake. But in my trial they made up all kinds of cake in their imaginations and even made the jury believe through their “hypnosis” that they were eating cake when in actuality there was none.

In the court recording of my trial, the voice of the Judge – the one who sentenced me to ten years in prison for “criminal sexual contact of a minor,” can be heard whispering to my attorney and the state’s attorneys during a bench conference with them, “There is no evidence to support that there was ever a touching of the breast.”

The prosecution’s entire case against me was predicated on their claim that I touched the breasts of the two minor ladies. Here, we have a statement by the presiding court judge himself, made during closing arguments at the very end of the trial, completely exonerating me. That statement is actually on the record, in the official court transcript, made by that same presiding judge in whom rests not only the legal power but the legal obligation to terminate trial proceedings, in what is called a Directed Verdict, when it is clear that no evidence is present to support the charges against the defendant. So by the judge’s own testimony – on the record – my attorney’s Motion for Directed Verdict should clearly have been granted, had the judge the slightest interest in justice and honesty.

In Heaven’s view of the matter, not only had every prosecuting attorney involved in my trial given sufficient evidence of their own guilt before the Eternal Judge, but the presiding trial judge himself had finally testified to his own guilt in, not a miscarriage of justice, but a factual abortion of it. “But they have done this in order that the word may be fulfilled that is written in their law, ‘They hated me without a cause.’” John 15:25 NAS That is, they found no cause in their own law for what they did to me, but simply extracted their charges out of a legal vacuum; and then proceeded to apply an existing law to my actions that no more fit the crime than if I had been charged with blowing up the Twin Towers. And the state Supreme Court approved his abortion of justice. What this has shown is how the legal system and its so-called expert witnesses of New Mexico are not about truth but about superstition, suspicion, self-guilt, prejudice, evil surmising and every other creepy, slippery corruption that is inherent in antichrist. Yes, it trumpets the end of the world as we have known it. I don’t expect them to change. The Supreme Court stated that there was no remedy for my "illegal" trial, so now there is no remedy for them.

One might ask the question now, Why did you not take this to the U.S. Supreme Court? The answer is simple. I did not think I would live long enough to see the outcome and I do not trust any of the nation’s judges any longer. They don’t follow the law. They just gang up and do what they want, especially against one who is not playing their game. They would just find some twisted logic to keep me behind bars anyway. My time and money would be wasted. How can one expect the devil to correct himself? The courts in New Mexico ganged up, and I could not expect the federal courts to do any differently. They have a way of stringing a case on ad infinitum, draining the resources of the defendant until he is wasted. This protracted legal tactic of bankrupting defendants and plaintiffs is always exploited in any criminal or civil action when the government feels it has something to lose. It’s their method of making justice simply disappear in a fog of litigation, leaving some poor soul, who deserves fair treatment from his government, standing with empty pockets, a mountain of debt, and often living on the streets. No, I chose to pass on that scenario.


Because of the refusal to dismiss my case (a dismissal for which there was abundant evidence) the state was allowed to create a “bad man” or “boogie man” image of me, but without permitting me the opportunity to share with the jury what the circumstances actually were. This tactic by the court was a complete surprise to us. In this the judge appeared to me to be uniquely complicit with the state’s attorneys. I felt that the judge was aiding and abetting the criminal behavior of the state by his duplicitous actions, and that the jury was intentionally prejudiced by the prosecution without my ever being permitted any attempt to mitigate or undo the prejudicial damage already done to the jury. The judge, whose agenda was clearly something other than justice, was permitting the state’s attorney to bring into record all manner of suspicions and rumors, unfounded in fact and lacking any legal pertinence to the issue at trial. While the state was thus allowed unbridled freedom to create a false concept of our church and its beliefs in the minds of the jurors, I was not permitted to address these falsehoods. I felt a certain kinship with Yeshua who had the same kind of trial before the High Priest and members of the Sanhedrin.

The state’s public defender seemed to me to be blindsided by what she considered illegal activities she never imagined possible in a court of law. And it seemed to both of us that the judge was consciously intent on perpetrating a basic unfairness in a thinly disguised miscarriage of justice. Repeatedly, time and again, my attorney’s valid motions were denied, if those motions seemed at all capable of exonerating me and resulting in a denial of my conviction, or proving that I was not guilty of the crime.

My trial was engineered to destroy my credibility by allowing the state to pose questions during my cross-examination that had nothing whatever to do with criminal sexual contact, but had everything to do with statecraft, smoke and mirrors, superstition and every other motive reminiscent of the Inquisition or the infamous Star Chamber, and as I mentioned, the Sanhedrin. At my first hearing I saw what they were doing. I turned to my attorney and said to her, “This is a railroad job isn’t it?” She just quietly nodded.


The great lie presented in my trial was not only over what I did, but what I am. My trial had all the markings of Satan where he takes one thing and completely turns it into something else. The Bible says that the beast “doth great wonders, so that he makes fire come down…” Rev. 13:13. He works miracles on the mind, causing people to see what they think is a great light (fire) from heaven, causing people to believe a lie, as he did in my trial. This “marvelous working of Satan” and the time of it was prophesied 130 years ago.

…when, under the influence of this threefold union [Roman Catholicism, apostate-Protestantism and spiritualism] our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government … then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near. A Prophecy of Ellen G. White, 1885, 5T 451

So this is the time in which we now reside. This spirit in the earth manifested against me in my trial is the same spirit that destroyed Jerusalem and then Rome, and it finally destroys the whole world.

Truly, now “we may know.”

Return to index Return to main page